In this post, we give you the ultimate breakdown for acing the Common Module unseen questions for Texts and Human Experiences.
Do you struggle with unseen texts? Do you always run out of time in for comprehension questions? Do you know what your responses are meant to look like? In this post, we will show you how to prepare for and ace the HSC Common Module Paper 1 Short Response Questions.
Section 1 of Paper 1 tests a few different things:
You need to be able to quickly read questions and unseen texts to construct responses
You need to be able to quickly analyse unseen texts. It is not enough to be able to spot superficial techniques in a text. Matrix students learn how to analyse unseen texts for higher order techniques and understand how these are developing the themes and ideas in the texts.
To succeed in Paper 1, you need to be able to do a quick analysis and then connect this analysis to the concerns and ideas that you have studied in the Common Module.
If you need help getting on top of your textual analysis skills, you should read our Beginner’s Guide to Acing HSC English Part 1: How to Analyse Your English Texts for Evidence.
If you want to write insightful responses to the Paper 1 unseen questions, then you need to have a detailed knowledge and understanding of the Common Module: Texts and Human Experiences rubric.
If you are unsure of what the Module is about or want to get a detailed understanding of it, then you must read our Year 12 English Advanced Study Guide article.
Students are often unsure of what they need to do when writing a response to unseen sections. How much do you need to write? How little?
When answering short answer questions, clarity and concision are key.
In fact, more important than the length is the quality and concision of the writing. Matrix students learn how to produce erudite and insightful responses that clearly relate their ideas and answers to the questions with supporting evidence.
Let’s look at the structure of Paper 1:
English Advanced Paper 1 has two sections:
The short response questions will involve 3-4 unseen texts and a series of 4 or 5 questions. This section will be worth 20 marks.
You will have 10 minutes reading time and 45 minutes writing time to complete each section.
That will depend.
In previous HSC Paper 1 exams, the length of the unseen texts has varied significantly. In some years, students have had no trouble reading all of the unseen texts, but in others, such as the 2018 HSC, students have struggled to complete the reading in the allocated time.
In the sample 2019 Paper 1 provided by NESA, for example, there are a pair of posters, a 30 line poem, a 536-word non-fiction piece, a 983-word non-fiction piece, and a longer extract from a fiction text.
The length of the unseen texts is a significant challenge that you must account for in your preparation and exam strategy. We’ll discuss the strategies Matrix students use later in this post.
These questions will total 20 marks, one question will require a miniature essay for a response. Students will need to allocate a little over 2 minutes per mark when responding to questions.
As we discussed above, the skills you need are:
But how do you develop and hone these skills?
Practise and feedback!
English is not an innate skill.
Successful English skills are developed through a consistent reading, an ongoing study practice, and regular writing and feedback cycle.
If you want to be able to approach your next unseen paper with a swagger, you need to practice unseen sections before-hand and get feedback on your responses.
You need to find short texts online and practice reading them and analysing against a timer.
A good process for doing this is to find texts that are similar in media, form, and length to previous HSC unseen texts and try to identify the main ideas and themes and a set number of examples within a few minutes.
This is actually quite a challenging task, especially the first few times that you try it.
To develop these skills try the following:
The skills you need to write a good short answer response are developed through practice and feedback.
Your peers who consistently get full marks for their unseen sections do so because they practise writing responses and get feedback on how to improve them and make them more concise and efficient. All conscientious English Advanced students should be scoring Band 6 for their unseen responses, if not full marks.
To practise your unseen responses, do the following:
One of the most common questions that students have about short responses is how long their responses should be.
The length of your responses will vary depending on how many marks the question is worth and how much time you can allocate to it.
For example, a three mark question is only worth 7 minutes of your time. So, you’re only going to be able to produce about 100-200 words at most (people tend to average about 13-31 words per minute by hand) in that amount of time depending on your handwriting. You need to keep your writing legible, too. It’s no point bashing out an amazing 210-word response if nobody can read it. Your marks would be better off with something much shorter and more legible.
You want to aim for one example and explanation per mark on offer. For example, if you have a two mark question, provide two examples and analysis of those examples.
The final question for the short response questions is usually worth between 6 and 7 marks and requires a miniature essay in response. The question can ask you to discuss one text or several. It is important that you structure your response accordingly.
This means you need a brief introduction, a body paragraph or two, and a brief conclusion.
Your introduction needs to briefly introduce your chosen text(s) and their relevance to the question. Try to include terms or phrases from the Common Module rubric in your thesis, as this will directly address the module concerns. You should keep your introduction under two sentences.
Your body needs to expand on these ideas. It is important that you use topic sentences to introduce your ideas.
If you must discuss two texts, you need to choose between writing a divided (a paragraph on each text) or integrated response (discussing both texts in one paragraph). Whichever structure you choose, you need to present two or three examples from each text and discuss them in detail.
If the question asks you to contrast or compare the texts, you must discuss the texts in relation to each other.
This will usually entail discussing how one text represents an aspect of human experience or emotion more effectively than another. Ensure that you relate your examples to the question, don’t just list technique, example, and effect.
Finally, your conclusion must summarise the argument, relating it back to the question and Common Module. Make sure that you restate your thesis. Aim for at least one sentence, if not two.
To get a sense of what you should include in a short response answer, let’s consider one of the NESA sample questions from their mock 2019 paper.
Example B (6 marks) English Standard and English Advanced
Compare how Text 2 and Text 3 explore the paradoxes in the human experience.
Text 2 can be found here and Text 3 is in the NESA sample paper.
Before you can write your response, you need to analyse the texts. It is important to use the question to guide the focus of your analysis.
This question asks students to discuss the paradoxes in the human experience. This is a statement from the rubric. A paradox is a statement that seemingly contradicts itself. So our analysis of these texts needs to focus in on things that seem contradictory or logically unacceptable.
Analysing Text 2
Text 2, Vern Rustala’s “Looking in the Album,” is an ekphrastic poem. Ekphrasis is the representation of an image in prose or poetry. In this poem, the speaker describes several photographs and little aspects of each.
The poem explores how photographs can only capture a limited aspect of human experience, even though they trigger memories. The poem also discusses how photographs don’t capture all of the moments and are often carefully curated.
There are a couple of paradoxes present, here:
Next, you need to find some examples that bear these paradoxes out. Because this is a 6 mark question and we have to compare two texts, we will look for two examples. One for each paradox. We will use the text’s form as our other example.
|Paradox 1||“The formal times are surrendered|
to the camera’s indifferent gaze: Weddings,
graduations, births and official portraits taken
every ten years to falsify appearances”
|Paradox 2||“We burned the negatives that we felt did not give a true|
account and with others made this abridgement of our lives.”
Analysing Text 3
In Text 3, Hillary McPhee explores the trouble she has in reconciling her profession as a historian with her love of her family’s stories and her grandmother’s ability to tell them.
This is an autobiographical text. It is a memoir that discusses her experience of mixing her personal and professional lives and the consequences of this.
This text discusses the conflict between wanting to know the truth about something and enjoying the romance of how it has been told.
There are a couple of paradoxes in this text as well:
Next, let’s look at some evidence. This time we’ll look at three examples, because this text’s paradoxes need a little more framing. McPhee opens with an extended metaphor that introduces the ideas:
|Opening extended metaphor||“First came her stories like webs across the world. They crisscrossed the Atlantic on steamers|
and the Rockies by train…In the night under the pine trees, her house creaked and her stories invaded our dreams.”
|Extended metaphor: Her stories are webs, they invade dreams||This extended metaphor explains the relationship between McPhee, her grandmother, and her grandmother’s stories.|
|Paradox 1||“Or so she said.” and “Or so the story goes …”||Juxtaposition: Between the content of the paragraph where she explores historical fact and compares to Grandmother’s narratives and the contradictory truncated sentences that conclude the paragraphs|
Contrast and contradiction throughout
|McPhee struggles to reconcile her professional interest as a historian in her Grandmother’s life with her nostalgia and love of her grandmother’s stories.|
|Paradox 2||“The historian at the back of my brain says I should discover what is true and what is false” and “The rest of me… still sees… the shapes and shadows of other places she made my own.”||Contrast and irony||This reflects how facing paradoxes in one’s experience can leave an individual torn between their professional and ambitious self and the emotional person who has connections with family.|
Now we’ve got some evidence, we’re in a position to write a response.
Let’s look at the question again:
Example B (6 marks) English Standard and English Advanced
“Compare how Text 2 and Text 3 explore the paradoxes in the human experience.”
So, this is a 6 mark question and requires us to compare the texts. This means that we need to use a miniature essay structure.
We then need to decide whether to use an integrated or divided response:
Your marks won’t be affected by your decision, only by the quality of your execution.
Our response will take the following structure:
Introduction: Two or three sentences outlining our response to the question and introducing the texts.
Body: An integrated response that analyses the texts and compares their representations of paradox in human experience across two paragraphs.
Conclusion: Two sentences that summarise your argument and connect it to the Module.
Okay, so what would this look like? Let’s look at the type of exemplary response a Matrix student would write.
Both Hillary McPhee and Vern Rustala explore the paradoxes we find in our human experiences. Rustala’s poem, “Looking in the Album,” delves into the idiosyncrasies and paradoxes of how we curate and remember our lives. While McPhee’s biographical excerpt catalogues the paradoxes and ironies she wrestled with while trying to balance her professional self with her personal self.
Memory and the process of remembering are rich with emotional complexity and, yet, fraught with paradox. Rustala employs a free-verse poem with heavy enjambment to reflect the conflicts and paradoxes of how we catalogue and record our lives. The persona’s observation that “Here the formal times are surrendered / to the camera’s indifferent gaze” combines enjambment and personification to convey the paradox of how we remember our lives. While humans keep photographs to remember important occasions and feel nostalgia for them as it is an important part of our emotional experience, the speaker observes that we relinquish control over them to an external force – one that is insouciant about our experience or feelings. In contrast, McPhee’s biography focuses on her own experiences and evokes nostalgia in her extended metaphor that “her stories [came] like webs across the world… and her stories invaded our dreams.” As Rustala’s images are a contrived remembrance of the past, so are McPhee’s grandmother’s. Only, in contrast, McPhee ascribes these partially fictionalised accounts a positive value.
“Looking in the Album’s” speaker is troubled by how photographs alter our past and, potentially, our memories when they observe that “[w]e burned the negatives that we felt did not give a true / account and with others made this abridgement of our lives.” The pun on “negatives” conflates photographic images with the poor experiences, developing the metaphor that by destroying negatives we are trying to cleanse ourselves of negative experiences. We can find a paradox at the heart of the ironic notion of manipulating things we feel do not “give a true account” of our lives. Essentially, Rustala is suggesting that we wish to have a true record, but adulterate it to suit our feelings. McPhee struggles with a similar yet different reconciliation between the true and romanticised accounts of her Grandmother’s life. In each paragraph McPhee explores the historical facts and contrasts them to her Grandmother’s accounts, instilling doubt into the veracity of her accounts with the truncated statements “[o]r so she said.” and “[o]r so the story goes …” These caveats frame the paradox she faces: she can’t be a nostalgic granddaughter and a historian at the same time. Pursuing truth comes at the expense of nostalgia. She makes this clear when she ironically observes that “[t]he historian at the back of my brain says I should discover what is true and what is false” while “[t]he rest of me… still sees… the shapes and shadows of other places she made my own.” The contrast between these two sides of her life highlights the emotional paradoxes that can affect our lives as we try to balance professional success with emotional fulfilment and happiness, nostalgia and fact.
Human experience is emotionally complex as we try to hold onto our past while struggling with the acceptable shape it must take. The differences between McPhee’s and Ruslata’s texts highlight this struggle – pointing to how sometimes our emotional security requires us to see things as they actually happened while at others we must shroud events in myth.
Now let’s look at some Dos and Don’ts for the unseen section of Paper 1.
Planning your time for Paper 1 is essential. You have 1 hour 40 minutes to complete the section. That breaks down to 45 minutes per section and 10 minutes reading time.
Do read the questions first.
Then read them again. To be efficient and accurate you need to read the unseen texts with the questions in mind.
Don’t just read the texts, analyse them.
As you read look for evidence that will help you answer the questions. The questions usually ask you to address specific ideas in each text. This is done to guide you to the examples you need to collect.
Do use your maths skills to calculate how much time to allocate to answering each question.
Each mark is worth 2.25 minutes of your time. This means that for a 2 mark question you don’t want to spend more than 5 minutes answering it. By this rationale, you want to be spending about 15-16 minutes on a miniature essay worth seven marks. If you don’t finish the question in the allotted time, cut your losses and start the next one.
Don’t answer the questions in order.
Make sure you analyse the texts based on the question, so you gather evidence for all of them. But don’t begin on the lower mark questions. Get the questions worth more in the bag, first.
Do respond to the question worth the most marks, first.
Be strategic and guarantee yourself the most marks that you can. Starting with the 6 or 7 mark question guarantees you a share of those marks. If you do run out of time before finishing one or two questions from the section, it is better that those questions are only worth one or two marks rather than a third of the paper!
Analysing texts on the fly is hard. You will need to practice this skill and ensure you are familiar with a wide range of literary and visual devices. If you need to brush up on them, we explain a comprehensive set of devices and techniques in our Essential Guide to English Techniques.
Don’t rush the reading of the unseen texts during the reading time.
Reading the questions will guide you as to how the text should be read and analysed. The questions will ask you to discuss how a composer represents a specific idea from the syllabus rubric. You want to identify that idea in the text, and note how they represent it.
Do try to identify multiple examples in each text.
Collecting as much evidence as possible on your first reading will make that easier. That way you have enough evidence to respond to several questions. You don’t have time to go back and do another reading.
Don’t get caught up in superficial analysis.
Techniques like alliteration and rhyme might have pleasing aesthetic qualities, but they are not as useful for representing concepts as metaphors or similes.
Do focus on higher order techniques.
Literary devices such as metaphor, motif, and irony over simple techniques such as alliteration. Your ability to spot higher order techniques will make analysing the texts far easier. Remember, you should practice on random short stories and poems you find on the internet.
Don’t ignore form and medium.
Your unseen texts will all have different forms. It is important that you take the time to think about how the composers’ choice of form influences meaning. Ask yourself, “what is the composer trying to achieve by utilising this form or medium?” You want to discuss this in your responses.
Do answer the questions clearly and concisely.
Ensure that you are answering the question asked. Before writing a response, reread the question to ensure that it will be a direct answer.
Don’t recount the text.
This will generally not constitute an answer to the question. Instead, respond as succinctly as possible to the question.
Do plan your responses according to their value.
As a rule, if the question is worth one mark, use at least one example and an explanation of its technique and effect. If the question is worth two marks, use at least two examples.
Don’t prioritise quantity over detail.
Remember, the markers are looking for detailed explanations of how an example represents an idea, not how many examples you can present. You need to respond to the ideas in the module. To do this effectively try to use terms and phrases from the Common Module rubric.
Now that you’ve seen how to respond to common module unseen questions and texts to produce spectacular responses, you’re ready to test your skills. You can download the paper with unseen texts and then we’ll send you sample responses along with marking criteria 24 hours later.